Public discussion about the need for a new state ideology or its denial with reference to the article of the Constitution of the Russian Federation confirms the existing extreme positions on the topic of filling the goals and objectives of social development with deep meanings. There are already certainly positive phenomena in influencing public consciousness, they often do not contradict each other due to deep historical traditions, gradual long-term moderation to meet public demands, preservation of identity and internal culture. And in this regard, in modern difficult times, definitions and models based on them are required, which are accepted by default by the general population, understandable, when everyone’s individual, creative supply chains, your inner awareness, its meaning, relationships with oneself and the world around you, its obligations on this basis. Concept of responsibility as thin, but a strong thread weaves everyone into a stable frame, forms polyvalent connections of responsibility and personal semantic awareness, answers to many internal questions and polyvalent connections of personal obligations in relations with the outside world, determining one’s place in the world and purpose in it.
Without taking into account the reasons for the lack of discussions about responsibility, then there seems an urgent need to popularise this concept and judging by the current events, both global and the characteristics of modern individual changes, then it’s like a forced measure, perhaps even in an imposed form to maintain a very precarious balance, formation of new forms of individual self-regulation, internal awareness and more global problems due to disagreements (political, interstate, interfaith, interethnic, inter-institutional and many, many others).
2. “ARCHAIC” RESPONSIBILITY AND UNSUSTAINABLE MODELS/SYSTEMS
In the new realities there is no discussion about responsibility, about her role and place, significance of this phenomenon. Destructive modern politics, implanted “universal values”, new rules”, in which there is not the slightest mention of the simplest, about mutual obligations, gradually influence and become stronger than the economy and trade, based on old ideology, responsibility, with completely different value categories. We are witnessing the gradual destruction of the basis for many subsequent generations, and the speed of such events is amazing.The worst periods in history are the result of irresponsibility, when compliance with obligations fades into oblivion and a fairly simple phenomenon like responsibility is replaced by complex structures to justify violence and force to cultivate other ideas alien to human nature.
The development of society is entirely related to the transformation of transition periods, where everything modern at the end of the previous period of history and completely new from the initial period of the subsequent stage were combined. There was responsibility in everything, accepted and respected by default by the majority as a stable bridge, on which individual integrity was built within each, This is how a strong connection was formed with the external community and the surrounding space.
The “archaism” of responsibility must be destroyed! A new appeal is possible, rethinking and applying the concept of responsibility is largely a forced measure as it was created long ago, unconsciously used, but certainly a useful and effective drug, a dose of homeopathy that still allows us to maintain the ability to create. This fact can be underestimated, but it is in us and the joint efforts of a new assessment and meaning, popularisation, perhaps imposing responsibility can make it the main regulator of the internal individual and external general system.
Why is it important? In the current transition period, the process of forming the meanings of the “new man” and the “new society” has been launched, changing the long period of the so-called fossil fuel economy.
At the same time, stakeholders sometimes put completely opposite concepts into the first two concepts, initially form contradictions. These contradictions exist both in the smallest social groups, and in multilateral global entities, an attempt to exit incorrectly from which can lead to a fatal outcome.
A simple example of the result of such contradictions is the stagnation of major breakthrough ideas, which, against the backdrop of sanctions restrictions, are becoming less and less common, forcing a return to the use of old technologies, devaluing previous achievements.
The world is moving towards a multipolar production system, based on a network of global production chains and the largest companies in each country, teaming up to manage research and development, production and trade. At the same time, small, medium and even large regional companies will be liquidated as a result of gradual mergers with global giants. As a result of the dominance of monopolies, complex and expensive technologies, expensive development and management, market orientation towards immediate results in the discovery of new technological principles, limited deep use and development of existing technologies. This negates the possibility of breakthrough research with the prospect of unpredictable results in the future.
